Real-time energy data sounds impressive—but is it always necessary? Learn when interval data might be the more practical and cost-effective solution.
The idea of real-time data sounds great. Instant visibility. Live feeds. The ability to watch your energy use change moment by moment.
But here’s the thing: just because something is faster doesn’t always make it better. And in the world of energy management, real-time data isn’t always the most practical—or cost-effective—solution.
When people talk about real-time data, it’s usually with a sense of urgency. The thought is: “If I could see everything happening right now, I could react faster and manage better.”
Sometimes, that’s true—especially for industrial operations or live system controls. But for most organizations, the real value comes from seeing clear trends over time, not watching data flash across a screen like a stock ticker.
That’s where interval data comes in.
Interval data (think 15-minute snapshots) provides the context you need to:
Understand usage patterns
Identify peak demand charges
Align operations with utility rate structures
Track performance over time
And it does all that without the complexity, infrastructure, or cost of setting up real-time telemetry across your entire portfolio.
In short: it’s just-right data. Not too slow, not overly fast—actionable, reliable, and built for strategic use.
It’s easy to get swept up in the promise of “more data, faster.” But if the data isn’t integrated into your decision-making process—or if your team is overwhelmed trying to keep up with it—then it’s not helping. It’s just noise.
So before chasing speed, it’s worth asking: what decisions are we trying to make, and what level of detail will actually help us make them?
You may find that what you really need isn’t real-time—it’s the right time.
Want help figuring out the right data strategy for your organization?
Let’s talk about what will work best for your goals (and your team).